Friday Legal Byte: What Is Summary Judgment?

Friday Legal Byte: What Is Summary Judgment?

Monday Legal Byte: What is Summary Judgment?

Summary judgment is a legal procedure designed to expedite cases where the defendant has no plausible defence and a tool designed to expedite the resolution of legal disputes by avoiding unnecessary trials. It is granted when the court is satisfied that there is no genuine issue of material fact to be tried and that one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

For example, in a ruling delivered today in favour of our client in Civil Suit No. E010 of 2023Kensalt Limited v. Regal Group of Companies Limited, the plaintiff sought summary judgment to expedite the recovery of an alleged debt. We successfully demonstrated that the case presented triable issues that warranted a full trial, making it unsuitable for summary judgment. The court found that the involvement of a debt collector and the existence of a settlement deed introduced complexities that rendered any alleged admission unclear and ambiguous. Consequently, the court dismissed the application, emphasizing the necessity for a full trial to resolve the disputed issues.

This ruling underscore the principle that summary judgment is only appropriate in cases where the defendant’s liability is clear-cut and uncontactable. When there are substantive issues that require thorough examination, as in this case, the matter must proceed to a full trial to ensure justice is served.

At Oluoch Kimori Advocates, we are committed to safeguarding our clients’ rights by ensuring that all matters are thoroughly examined and justly adjudicated.

For any queries, feel free to reach out to Lilian Oluoch-Wambi or Davis Langat.

#MondayLegalByte #LegalVictory #CivilLitigation #SummaryJudgment #OluochKimoriAdvocates

See More on Kenya Law: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/13578/eng@2024-11-06

Division of Matrimonial Property

Division of Matrimonial Property

Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Quantifying Non-Monetary Contribution In Division Of Matrimonial Property

The presumption that the beneficial interests in matrimonial property are equal has been rebutted by the High Court in March 2017 in the case of PNN –vs- ZWN {2017)eKLR. The court noted that allowing such a supposition would create an escape for fortune seekers to gain an advantage from their spouse’s success in a divorce. Therefore, the provision of section 7 of the Matrimonial Property Act, which guarantees division based on each party’s contribution, was maintained.

The current position is that property acquired during the marriage is considered matrimonial property and is subject to a division based on the contribution of each party towards its acquisition, both monetary and non-monetary.

Production of evidence is effective for parties to use in claiming contribution

However, the courts face difficulties in assessing the net worth of a spouse who has not made financial contributions. Evidence produced by parties is crucial in establishing non-monetary contributions, and parties must present thorough evidence to make it easier for the courts to apportion their contribution.

A stay-at-home spouse cannot claim compensation if their contribution cannot be quantified. The sufficiency of the evidence is vital in aiding courts to distribute matrimonial property appropriately and fairly.

The Matrimonial Property Act does not make it easier for courts to assess non-monetary contributions. Therefore, the production of evidence becomes an effective device for parties to use in claiming contribution and assisting courts in quantifying their contribution, provided the evidence is sufficient and effectively produced.

Note that this information is for reference purposes only. If you have any concerns or require clarification on any issue, please contact Lilian Oluoch-Wambi at ow@oluochkimori.com.

Comments

Join

Work With us